MODELLING OF INVESTMENT PROCESSES IN THE SPHERE  OF SOCIAL HOUSE BUILDING

Larisa Seliutina; Marina Egorova; Kseniia Bulgakova

doi:10.12955/cbup.v5.904

Larisa Seliutina Petersburg State Transport University Emperor Alexander I Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Marina Egorova The Bonch-Bruevich Saint - Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Kseniia Bulgakova Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.904

Keywords: Construction, housing, investment, finance

Abstract

The problem of not enough public housing for low-income citizens is very urgent in the entire world. This article is dedicated to the topical question; how do we select optimal investment projects and implement successful investment programs to fund public housing projects better. We have formulated basic principles for the formation of an optimal portfolio to use as a standard for investment programs for public housing construction projects. As selection criteria, instead of profitability and risk offered in classical portfolio theory to which private investors are paying attention, we propose the use of social satisfaction survey results and amount of available funding to determine the effectiveness of the programs. We have developed several mathematical models that help aid in the selection of investment projects based on these new requirements. The application of these models in the selected projects selection within the framework of investment programs of public housing construction will allow the most effective use of funds directed to the development of the public housing

References

Berens, B. & Havranek, P.M. (1995). Guidance on evaluation of investment efficiency. Moscow: Infra-M , 235-238

Heijden H.M., Haffner M.E. & Hoekstra J.S. (2006), Bridging the Gap Between Social and Market Rented Housing in Six European Countries.Delft: Delft University.

Fisher P. (2003). Common stocks and uncommon profits. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. Inc. Publ.

Heijden H.M., Haffner M.E. & Hoekstra J.S. (2006), Bridging the Gap Between Social and Market Rented Housing in Six European Countries.Delft: Delft University.

Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, Uncertain and Profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin Publ.

Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: Jolin Wiley Publ. 135-145

Markowitz, H.M. (1987). Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital. New York: Jolin Wiley Publ. 211-213

Merton, R.C. (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous – time case. Review of Economic and Statistics, 51, 247-257.

Modigliani, F. (1949). Fluctuation in the Saving income ratio: a problem in economic forecasting. Studies in Income and Wealth. New York: NBER Publ., XI, 445.

Selyutina, L. & Bulgakova, K (2014). Development of nonprofit housing as a method of forming an affordable and comfortable accommodation in Saint-Petersburg. Theory and practice of social development, 1, 374-376.

Selyutina, L. (2016). Formation of market offers in the field of construction and reconstruction of housing in Russia.

Scientific results. Series: Technology, business and service. V. 2, No. 3, 44-56. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9346-2016-2-3-50-56

Tyirtyishov, Y.P. Problems of formation of affordable housing market in the Russian Federation. Construction Economy, 11, 3-38.

Williams, D.B. (1995). Trading chaos or profit maximization. Moscow: IR Analysis.

Zhuk, V.A. (2012). Regional housing policy in the development strategy of major cities. St. Petersburg: ROST.176-178.

Expected Return, Variance And Standard Deviation Of A Portfolio (2017). Retrieved from: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-finance/4/return-risk/expected-return.aspx