• Jan Betta Wroclaw University of Technology
  • Joanna Jastrzebska Wroclaw University of Technology
Keywords: research project, research project management, factors of success, good practices


Project management assists many areas of human activities and recently has been considered as a way to ensure the success of scientific research projects. A primary problem is the need to identify the project’s success factors, which include phenomena, actions, events, and parameters that contribute to the success. The purpose of this study is to identify the management issues and oversights that pose a negative effect on scientific research projects. The study involves a questionnaire, distributed to several managers of research projects conducted within Polish universities. This paper presents the results of assessing responses to two questions of this survey. These questions about project management deal with goals achieved by marginal projects and an analysis ex post. The responses to each question are grouped into five types, on which a frequency analysis is performed. For each group, several conclusions and recommendations are proposed. The results are a first attempt to construct a set of suitable practices for the management of scientific research projects.


Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 337–42.

Baccarini, D. (30. 4 1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal.

Buisseret, T., Cameron, H., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What Difference Does It Make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, Volume 10(Issue 4-6).

Cameron, H. (July 2016). What Does Success Look Like? A typology of success and failure in innovation. Paper submitted to: R&D Management Conference 2016 “From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation”, 3-6.

Cheng, M., Tsai, H., & Sudjono, E. (2012). Evolutionary fuzzy hybrid neutral network for dynamic project assessment in construction industry. Automation in Construction, 46-51.

Cleland, D. (1986). Measuring Success: The owner’s viewpoint. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Seminar/Symposium (Montreal/Canada), 6-12.

DeCotiis, T., & Dyer, L. (1979, January). Defining and measuring project performance. Research Management.

Greer, M. (1999). Handbook of Human Performance Technology.

Gryzik, A., & Knapińska, A. (2012). Zarządzanie projektami badawczo-rozwojowymi w sektorze nauki. Warszawa: OPI – Instytut Badawczy.

Kamińska, A. (April 2014). Ewaluacja i monitoring projektów badawczo-rozwojowych jako narzędzie wspomagające zarządzanie projektami. Studium przypadku międzynarodowego projektu p. n. „Matches – towards the modernization of higher education institutions in Uzbekistan”. Gospodarka a rozwój regionalny, Studia i Materiały. Miscellanea Oeconomicae.

Larson, E., & Gobeli, D. (1989, June). Significance of Project Management Structure on Development Success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2), 119 – 125.

Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Mari, L. (2011). A model for R&D performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 134, no. 1, 212-223.

Lim, C., & Mohamed, Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International journal of project management, 17.

Morris, P., & Hugh, G. (1987). The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. John Wiley and Sons.

Pinto, J., & Slevin, D. (1988). Critical Success Factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 22-27.

Stuckenbruck, L. (1986). Who determines project success? Proceedings of the 18th Annual Seminar/Symposium.

Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? International journal of project management, 16.1, 59-63.

Westerveld, E. (2003). The Project Excellence Model: linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 411–418.