MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS – LESSONS LEARNED
Abstract
Project management assists many areas of human activities and recently has been considered as a way to ensure the success of scientific research projects. A primary problem is the need to identify the project’s success factors, which include phenomena, actions, events, and parameters that contribute to the success. The purpose of this study is to identify the management issues and oversights that pose a negative effect on scientific research projects. The study involves a questionnaire, distributed to several managers of research projects conducted within Polish universities. This paper presents the results of assessing responses to two questions of this survey. These questions about project management deal with goals achieved by marginal projects and an analysis ex post. The responses to each question are grouped into five types, on which a frequency analysis is performed. For each group, several conclusions and recommendations are proposed. The results are a first attempt to construct a set of suitable practices for the management of scientific research projects.References
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 337–42.
Baccarini, D. (30. 4 1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal.
Buisseret, T., Cameron, H., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What Difference Does It Make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, Volume 10(Issue 4-6).
Cameron, H. (July 2016). What Does Success Look Like? A typology of success and failure in innovation. Paper submitted to: R&D Management Conference 2016 “From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation”, 3-6.
Cheng, M., Tsai, H., & Sudjono, E. (2012). Evolutionary fuzzy hybrid neutral network for dynamic project assessment in construction industry. Automation in Construction, 46-51.
Cleland, D. (1986). Measuring Success: The owner’s viewpoint. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Seminar/Symposium (Montreal/Canada), 6-12.
DeCotiis, T., & Dyer, L. (1979, January). Defining and measuring project performance. Research Management.
Greer, M. (1999). Handbook of Human Performance Technology.
Gryzik, A., & Knapińska, A. (2012). Zarządzanie projektami badawczo-rozwojowymi w sektorze nauki. Warszawa: OPI – Instytut Badawczy.
Kamińska, A. (April 2014). Ewaluacja i monitoring projektów badawczo-rozwojowych jako narzędzie wspomagające zarządzanie projektami. Studium przypadku międzynarodowego projektu p. n. „Matches – towards the modernization of higher education institutions in Uzbekistan”. Gospodarka a rozwój regionalny, Studia i Materiały. Miscellanea Oeconomicae.
Larson, E., & Gobeli, D. (1989, June). Significance of Project Management Structure on Development Success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2), 119 – 125.
Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Mari, L. (2011). A model for R&D performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 134, no. 1, 212-223.
Lim, C., & Mohamed, Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International journal of project management, 17.
Morris, P., & Hugh, G. (1987). The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. John Wiley and Sons.
Pinto, J., & Slevin, D. (1988). Critical Success Factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 22-27.
Stuckenbruck, L. (1986). Who determines project success? Proceedings of the 18th Annual Seminar/Symposium.
Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? International journal of project management, 16.1, 59-63.
Westerveld, E. (2003). The Project Excellence Model: linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 411–418.
Copyright information
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
info@iseic.cz, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz