AUTOMATING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SELECTED-RESPONSE ITEMS WITH A TEXT-TO-ITEMS CONVERTER
AbstractThis paper focuses on the role of technology in facilitating the process of language test development in online settings. In particular, it takes an in-depth look at one specific step in the entire testing cycle: the construction of (selected-response) test items with the aid of the text-to-items converter on WebClass, the author’s own online learning management system (webclass.co). The text converter can be used to edit an entire set of questions in a single editor pane (similar to a word processor) and then submit them to a parsing script which converts them into test items proper. The main advantage of using the converter is time efficiency: instead of moving step-by-step from one item to the next (which may be time-consuming), a large number of test items can be created in one go.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bruno, J. E., & Dirkzwager, A. (1995). Determining the optimal number of alternatives to a multiple-choice test item: An information theoretic perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 959–966.
Douglas, D. (2010). Understanding Language Testing. London: Hodder Education.
Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical Language Testing. London: Hodder Education.
Gierl, M. J., & Haladyna, T. M. (Eds.). (2013). Automatic Item Generation: Theory and Practice. New York and London: Routledge.
Haladyna, T. M. (2013). Automatic item generation: A historical perspective. In M. J. Gierl & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Automatic Item Generation: Theory and Practice (pp. 13–25). New York and London: Routledge.
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 309–334.
Landrum, R. E., Cashin, J. R., & Theis, K. S. (1993). More evidence in favor of three-option multiple-choice tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 771–778.
Malec, W. (2012). WebClass [learning management system]. Retrieved from http://webclass.co
Malec, W. (2015). Testing collocational knowledge: the question of item format. In A. Bloch-Rozmej & K. Drabikowska (Eds.), Within Language, Beyond Theories: Studies in Applied Linguistics (pp. 74–92). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., & Davey, T. (2002). Practical Considerations in Computer-Based Testing. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Plannedparrothood (n. d.). Retreived from http://www.plannedparrothood.com/jokes.html
Roever, C. (2001). Web-based language testing. Language Learning & Technology, 5(2), 84–94.
Trevisan, M. S., Sax, G., & Michael, W. B. (1994). Estimating the optimum number of options per item using an incremental option paradigm. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 86–91.
Webclass (a) (n. d.). Retrieved from http://webclass.co/tests_edit/import-from-text.php
Webclass (b) (n. d.). Retrieved from http://webclass.co/tests_edit/index.php
Webclass (c) (n. d.). Retrieved from http://webclass.co/tests/tests.preview.php
Webclass (d) (n. d.). Retrieved from http://webclass.co/tests_edit/import-from-text.php; the text in the editor area adapted from http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160412-what-really-happened-when-we-met-neanderthals
Webclass (e) (n. d.). Retrieved from http://webclass.co/tests/tests.preview.php
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
email@example.com, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz