• Vesela Kazashka Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv
  • Dora Levterova Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv
  • Margarita Ruseva Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv


Communication requires unconditional respect for the other. Acknowledging the qualities of the people   is a basis for good communication.  Communication starts when you accept the people the way they are. The social, economic and technical development provides opportunities for good professional realization of people with special educational needs.  The resistance, striving for “survival” and successful “introduction” into the social life are a prerequisite for success. The people who are stigmatized and their families are aware that once they have been labeled, they should have to overcome this stigma and to take the maximum possible good out of this label. Positive stigma stimulates the people with disabilities seek more contacts, to become more independent and to realize themselves adequately in the social life. The survey of attitudes and motivation scale contact with people with disabilities give reliable information about what is the attitude of students towards people with disabilities and what were their contacts. The successful integration into society of people with special educational needs depends also on the perceptions and attitudes of the professionals who work with them too. Undoubtedly, the attitudes and models for the disabled people change and will continue to change. In this context the disabled people should develop social identity and public awareness, but not only in their stigmatized group, but in a broad social aspect.   


Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (2000) Attitudes and the attitude – behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European review of social psychology, 1 (3).

Daruwalla, P. & Darcy, S. (2005). Personal and social attitudes to disability. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 549-570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.10.008

Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207 (4), pp. 93 - 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93

Likert, R. (1932). Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-55

Mann, H. & Whitney, D. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 18, pp.50-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491

Sidorenko, E.(2007). Methods of mathematical processing in psychology. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Rech'. PMCid:2242789

Stamatov, R. & Enchev, N. (2012). Human behavior. Plovdiv, Bulgaria: Publishing house Hermes.

Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 80-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3001968

Yuker, H. & Hurley, M. (1987). Contact with and attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 32 (3), pp.145-154.