• Tatiana Prisyazhnyuk Saratov State University, Russian Federation
  • Elena Zilova Saratov State University, Russian Federation
Keywords: Media Discourse, fundamental values, national values, transformation of values, anti-values


In the study of mass communication, there has been much debate as to what extent the media can influence the audience. Instead of merely reviewing existing findings in the field, this article aims at searching for some new aspects to the problem.  Previously, the study of Media Discourse was mainly restricted to the role of the media in the context of political or social sphere.  This research offers to study the issue within a broader multidisciplinary framework involving such macrostructures as society, the mass media, language, and cognition.

The primary objective of the research is to define Media Discourse in the context of the study of values representation. The methods employed in the research are: discourse analysis, linguo-cognitive modeling, componential analysis, and contrastive linguo-cultural analysis. Modern Russian and British media texts were randomly selected for analysis building a corpus of 200 items. In connection with Media Discourse, at least three types of values should be distinguished: discourse values or discourse qualities; values endemic to a particular society, and broadcast by the media in order to cultivate national identity; specific media values generated by certain media, which in many instances can be viewed as “anti-values.” The research findings claim that this trend can be observed both in the Russian and British Media Discourse. 


Babaeva, E. V. (2004). Lingvokulturologicheskie kharakteristiki russkoi i nemetskoi aksiologicheskih kartin mira [Russian and German norm-value picture of the world]. Volgograd, Russia: Volgograd University Press.

Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in Media Discourse. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Code of Professional Ethics of Russian Journalist (1995). Retrieved September 30, 2013, from

Editors’ Code of Practice (2011). Retrieved September 30, 2013 from

Fairclouth, N. (2004). Analyzing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fasold, R. (1990). The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

King, A. (2013, May 15) What does it mean to be British? Retrieved from

Leith, J. (2013). The Futuregen Glossary: A collection of definitions for innovation, change and strategy practitioners. Retrieved September 30, 2013, from

O'Caroll, L. (2013, March 18). Press regulation at risk as newspaper groups refuse to endorse deal. Retrieved from

Rogozina, I. V. (2003). Media kartina mira: kognitivno-semioticheskii aspekt [Media-picture of the world: cognitive-semiotic aspect]. Barnaul, Russia: Barnaul University Press

Roy, C. B. (2000). Interpreting as a Discourse Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, Massachusetts & Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

The Telegraph (2013, April 12). Ban on homophobic teacher upheld. Retrieved from

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Power and the News Media. In D. L. Paletz (Ed.), Political communication in action: states, institutions, movements, audiences. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and Discourse. How social contexts control text and talk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.