PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS A MOTIVATOR OF GENERATION Y
Abstract
Along with Generation Y entering the market place, the human resources specialists have selected significant generation differences. The generations vary in values, expectations, approach to work, supervisors, and organization. These differences are very important for human resources management improvement as well as the motivation system in a company. The existing survey shows that Generation Y greatly appreciates the possibilities of professional development at work and it is important inducement for young employees.
The aim of the article is to identify the approach of Polish Generation Y to their professional development and confirm that companies have to offer suitable conditions for professional development to attract and maintain the biggest talents. Based on the questionnaire survey conducted among generation Y employees, we attempt to answer the following questions: “is the possibility of professional development the most important motivator?” “Could the lack of the company support for professional development be the reason for giving up the job?” “How does Generation Y take care of their own professional development?” The research shows that the possibility of professional development is not the most important motivation factor for Polish generation Y; this is because they value family, personal relations, and time for their passions or relaxation more. In fact, these factors are more valuable for Generation Y than money and work.
Furthermore, for young employees the lack of support in professional development by the organization is an important aspect that could cause them to leave the organization. Despite good preparation for work, generation Y employees still pursue further education, while working, in order to enhance their professional development. Human resource management practice in Polish companies should consider these conclusions under the scope of motivation system and talent management.
References
Armstrong, M. (2006). Strategic Human Resource Management. A Guide to Action. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Beyond the baby boomers: the rise of Generation Y. Opportunities and challenges for the funds management industry (2007). KPMG Investment Management and Funds.
Business Dictionary (n.d.). Retrieved December 22, 2013 from http://www.businessdictionary.com
European HR Best Practice Report - Full Report 2011 (2011). A CRF Institute Benchmark Study on Top Employers in Europe. The CRF Institute.
Glass, A. (2007). Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial & Commercial Training, 39(2).
Hurst, J. L., & Good L. K. (2009). Generation Y and Carter choice. The impact of retail career perceptions, expectations and entitlement perceptions. Career Development International, 14(6), 570-593.
Hutchinson, D., Brown, J., & Longworth, K. (2012). Attracting and maintaining the Y Generation in nursing: a literature review. Journal of Nursing Management, 20, 444-450.
Leask, A., Fyall, A., & Barron, P. (2013). Generation Y: An Agenda for Future Visitor Attraction Survey. International Journal of Tourism Survey. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Plink, D. (2009). Retention Y What is the key to retention of Generation Y? Whitepaper Generation Y. CRF Institute.
Shaffer, J. (2008). Gen Y Talent: How to Attract and Retain the Young and the Restless. Saba White Paper.
Talentsmoothie (2008). Generation Y: What they want from work. A summary report of the “Tell it how it is” Survey 2008. Retrieved from http://talentsmoothie.com/sbd/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Copy-of-GenYtellithowitisA4Final.pdf.
Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, Ch. D. (2002). Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363-382.
Copyright information
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
info@iseic.cz, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz