PROBLEMS OF MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
The paper provides the results of an empirical study of evaluation of the efficiency of public and private sectors in provision infrastructure services. The imperative research and comparative analysis methods used, revealed a number of “bottlenecks”, including gaps in the legislation and institutional restrictions, lack of experience in cooperation between state and private enterprises, deficiencies in public procurement procedures and executing PPP contracts. The results allow concluding of the significant potential and viability of PPP model in the conditions of Uzbekistan.
Arrow, K. J. & Lind, R. C. (1970, June). Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions. American Economic Review, 60, 364–78.
Charles, W. (1993). Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives. A RAND Research Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
de Sa Almeida, A. (2004, December). Public - Private Partnerships in Brazil. Retrieved March 5, 2013 from The George Washington University: http://www.gwu.edu/~ibi/minerva/Fall%202004/public-private%20partnerships.pdf?&lang=en_us&output=json
Fay, M. & Yeppes, T. (2003). Investing in Infrastructure – What is needed from 2000 to 2010? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3102.
Fiscal Affairs Department. (2004). Public-Private Partnerships. (pp. 11-12). IMF, March 12, 2004. Retrieved April 20, 2013, from http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/2004/pifp/eng/031204.pdf
Hall, D. (2004). PPPs: a critique of the Green Paper. Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), Business School. London: University of Greenwich.
Kenneth, J. & Lind, R. C. (1970). Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions. American Economic Review, 60, 364–78.
Pina, V. & Torres, L. (2001). Analysis of the Efficiency of Local Government Services Delivery: An Application to Urban Public Transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35A (10), 929-944. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00033-1
Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus Private Ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 133–50. doi: 10.1257/jep.12.4.133
Tulyaganov, S. (2007). Private-Public Partnerships in Uzbekistan: Country Report. Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Conference on Public-Private Partnerships for infrastructure development held at Seoul, South Korea. October 5, 2007. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/ppp/PPP2007/mm_uzbekistan.pdf
UNDP (United Nations Development Program). (2007). Private-public partnership in Uzbekistan: problems, opportunities and ways of introduction. Analytical Report № 2007/06. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Business Forum of Uzbekistan. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/Report_on_Public_Private_Partnership_in_Uzbekistan.pdf
Wolfe, C. (1993). Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives. A RAND Research Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2nd ed.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
email@example.com, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz