ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PROGRAMS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

  • Ana Maria Zorlescu Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Science and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest
  • Stelian Baraitareanu Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Science and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest
  • Doina Danes Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agronomic Science and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, One Health, good practice guide

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the topical issues that is part of the “One Health” concept with implications for animal health, human health, and even environmental “health”. At the European Commission (EC) level, legislation has been issued for the monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and these rules are applicable by each Member State (MS). For the proper implementation of the above legislation, audits are carried out in Member States that have developed programs on antimicrobial resistance that go beyond the EC's requests.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was the analysis of existing data reports, legislation and recommendations on antimicrobial resistance through which surveillance and monitoring is carried out in the European Union (EU).  

METHODS: The audit reports issued between 2015 and 2017 by the Food Veterinary Office (FVO), as well as the articles and studies issued by the EC through the antimicrobial resistance institutes were analysed.

RESULTS: The FVO conducted audits to “evaluate the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria in certain food-producing animal populations and food” in 12 MS, and audits to “gather information on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals” in 8 MS. These are countries that have very well implemented the EC's requests and included the “One Health” perspective in antimicrobial resistance programs. Some Member States have risk management strategies for reducing antimicrobial resistance for more than 20 years. They have carried out research projects on antimicrobial resistance. There is an action plan on antimicrobial resistance at the EC level, but their implementation and understanding up to the level of all actors involved in this issue varies from MS to MS. Antimicrobial resistance in the animal population is a topical issue, notoriety among the actors involved, as well as an interdisciplinary problem with indirect results. The same principle of antimicrobial resistance in animals is applicable to humans and the environment as such, this problem can be embedded in the concept of “One Health”. The overall objective of the MS is to generate knowledge and tools to “combat” antimicrobial resistance in animals, humans and even the environment.

CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, in order to improve and optimize antimicrobial resistance programs, a “good practice guide” can be achieved by MS with extensive experience in this area, to be used by MS with a more precarious application and over time to harmonize antimicrobial resistance programs within the EU.

References

Call, D.R., Matthews, L., Subbiah, M., Liu, J. (2013). Do antibiotic residues in soils play a role in amplification and transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria in cattle populations? Frontiers in Microbiology, 4, 193.

Commission Notice (2015). Guidelines for the prudent use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine (2015/C299/04). http://ec.europa.eu/health/sites /health/files/antimicrobial_resistance/docs/2015_prudent_use_guidelines_en.pdf

Decisions 2013/652/EU (2013). Commission Implementing Decision of 12 November 2013 on the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria (notified under document C(2013)7145). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013D0652

DG SANTE (2016a). Report ref. DG (SANTE) 2016-8888-MR: Final report of a fact-finding mission carried out in Romania from 21 November 2016 to 25 November 2016 in order to gather information on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/act_getPDF.cfm?PDF_ID=13110

DG SANTE (2016b). Report ref. DG (SANTE) 2016-8886-MR: Final report of a fact-finding mission carried out in Finland from 16 May 2016 to 20 May 2016 in order to gather information on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/act_getPDF.cfm?PDF_ID=12752

DG SANTE (2016c). Report ref. DG (SANTE) 2016-8887-MR: Final report of a fact-finding mission carried out in Spain from 20 October 2016 to 28 October 2016 in order to gather information on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/act_getPDF.cfm?PDF_ID=13201

DG SANTE (2016d). Report ref. DG SANTE 2016-8884-MR: Final report of a fact-finding mission carried out in Cyprus from 10 October 2016 to 14 October 2016 in order to gather information on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/act_getPDF.cfm?PDF_ID=12924

DG SANTE (2016e). Report ref. DG SANTE 2016-8882-MR: Final report of a fact-finding mission carried out in Denmark from 01 February 2016 to 05 February 2016 in order to gather information on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Pressemeddelelser/2016/Final_Report_EU-Kommissionen_2016_USE_OF_ANTIMICROBIALS_IN_ANIMALS.pdf

DG SANTE (2016f). DG SANTE 2016-8677-MR: Final report of an audit carried out in Romania from 05 December 2016 to 15 December 2016 in order to evaluate the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria in certain food producing animal populations and food. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/audit_reports/details.cfm?rep_id=3789

DG SANTE (2017a). Commission services' assessment of the Action Plan submitted by the competent authorities of the United Kingdom in response to Report ref. DG SANTE/2017-6194-MR of the audit carried out from 21 March 2017 to 31 March 2017 in order to evaluate the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria in certain food-producing animal populations and food. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/act_getPDFannx.cfm?ANX_ID=8820

DG SANTE (2017b). Commission services' assessment of the Action Plan submitted by the competent authorities of Hungary in response to Report ref. DG SANTE/2016-8676-MR of the audit carried out from 04 October 2016 to 12 October 2016 in order to evaluate the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria in certain food-producing animal populations and food. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/act_getPDFannx.cfm?ANX_ID=8779.

DG SANTE (2017c). DG SANTE 2017-6197: Final report of an audit carried out in Lithuania from 12 September 2017 to 19 September 2017 in order to evaluate the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria in certain food producing animal populations and food. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/audit_reports/details.cfm?rep_id=3906

DG SANTE (2017d). DG SANTE 2017-6247: Final report of a one health country visit to Luxembourg with ECDC from 29 May 2017 to 02 June 2017 to discuss policies relating to antimicrobial resistance. http://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/audit_reports/details.cfm?rep_id=3893

EFSA and ECDC (2011). The European Union Summary Report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in the European Union in 2009. EFSA Journal, 9(7), 2154. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2154.

EFSA and ECDC (2016). The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2014. EFSA Journal, 14(2), 4380. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4380

EFSA and ECDC (2017). The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2015. EFSA Journal, 15(2), 4694. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4694

Larsson, D.G.J. (2014). Antibiotics in the environment. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 119(2), 108-112. http://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2014.896438

Marathe, N.P., Regina, V.R., Walujkar, S.A., Charan, S.S., Moore, E.R., Larsson, D.G., Shouche, Y.S. (2013). A treatment plant receiving waste water from multiple bulk drug manufacturers is a reservoir for highly multi-drug resistant integron-bearing bacteria. PLoS One, 8(10), e77310.

O’Neill, C. (2016). Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. London, UK: Wellcome Trust and UK Department of Health; Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf

Queenan, K., Hasler, B., Rushton, J. (2016). A One Health approach to antimicrobial resistance surveillance: is there a business case for it? Int J Antimicrob Agents, 48, 422–427.

Travis, D.A., Sriramarao, P., Cardona, C., Steer, C.J., Kennedy, S., Sreevatsan, S., Murtaugh, M.P. (2014). One Medicine One Science: a framework for exploring challenges at the intersection of animals, humans, and the environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1334(1), 26-44.

UK VARSS (2017). Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance and Sales Surveillance 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/veterinary-antimicrobial-resistance-and-sales-surveillance-2016.

Published
2018-09-25