• Liana Dehelean “Victor Babes” University of Medicine & Pharmacy Timişoara
  • Ana Maria Romosan “Victor Babes” University of Medicine & Pharmacy Timişoara
  • Ion Papava “Victor Babes” University of Medicine & Pharmacy Timişoara
  • Radu Stefan Romosan “Victor Babes” University of Medicine & Pharmacy Timişoara
  • Papazian Petru Politehnica University of Timişoara, Faculty of Electronics & Telecommunications, Applied Electronics Department
  • Babaita Mircea Politehnica University of Timişoara, Faculty of Electronics & Telecommunications, Applied Electronics Department
Keywords: undergraduate medical education, satisfaction, foreign students, emigration,


Background: In Romania, foreign medical students have the possibility to learn the same curricula in Romanian, English, or French. The purpose of the study: To compare students’ satisfaction with training and future career opportunities from the perspective of Romanian and foreign students. Methods: The study was conducted for terminal year medical students divided into two samples, Romanian and foreign language students. The participants were invited to fill in a satisfaction questionnaire about their professional training and to express preferences for future career. Results: Foreign students were more satisfied with the lectures and the teaching staff. They attended optional lectures more frequently in comparison with Romanian students. Foreign students were more inclined to attend medical conferences and to enroll in PhD programs. While Romanian students were more inclined to consider emigration, foreign students prefer to practice in their native countries. Conclusions: Compared to their Romanian colleagues, foreign students were more engaged in educational and research activities.


Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor, KM. (2007). Student Decisions about Lecture Attendance: Do Electronic Course Materials Matter? Academic Medicine. 10:73-76.

Cotton SJ, Dollard MF, de Jonge J. (2002). Stress and Student Job Design: Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Performance in University Students. International Journal of Stress Management. 9:147-162.

Epstein RM. (2007). Assessment in Medical Education. N Engl J Med. 356:387-96.

Harden RM, Crosby J. (2000). AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer - the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher. 22:334-347.

Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Veloski, JJ, Erdmann JB, Callahan CA, Magee M. (2002). Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Medical Education. 36:522–527.

Kellaghan T, Greaney V. (2001). Using assessment to improve the quality of education. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. (2002). University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education. 27:17-52.

Patel MS, Lypson ML, Davis MM. (2009). Medical Student Perceptions of Education in Health Care Systems. Academic Medicine. 9:1301-1306.

Schreiber BE, Fukuta J, Gordon F. (2010). Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 10:1-6.

Seymour E. (2001). Tracking the Processes of Change in US Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. Sci Ed. 86:79–105.

Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D, Powers AC. (2003). Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 51:149-156.