EMPLOYEES’ EXTRINSIC MOTIVES AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING: INTERVENING ROLE OF AN INTRINSIC MOTIVE
Drives of knowledge sharing in businesses not only arise extrinsically from employees but also intrinsically. Accordingly, this study focuses on examining the effect of employee’s organizational identification (intrinsic motive) on the relationship between the organizational climate (extrinsic motive) and employee’s knowledge sharing in family businesses in Sri Lanka. Measures of organizational climate, organizational identification, and knowledge sharing were collected by a questionnaire survey of 126 employees working in family businesses. Stratified random sampling technique selected respondents from diverse firms and jobs. While descriptive and correlation analysis elaborated the sample characteristics, the results of the hierarchical regression indicated that extrinsic motivational factors of organizational climate have strong positive relations to employees’ knowledge sharing. Additionally, results confirmed that employees’ intrinsic motivational factor of organizational identification mediates the relationship between organizational climate and employees’ knowledge sharing. Theoretically, this study contributes to linking employees’ extrinsic and intrinsic motives of knowledge sharing in family business context to expand the employees’ behavioural theories. Practically, managers of family businesses would find new avenues to promote employees’ knowledge sharing.
Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone But Not Forgotten: Labor Flows, Knowledge Spillovers, and Enduring Social Capital. Journal of Economic Geography 6(5), 571–591.
Allio, M. K. (2004). Family businesses: their virtues, vices, and strategic path. Strategy & Leadership, 32(4), 24–34.
Argote, L., McEvily, B. & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Inte-grative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes. Management Science 49, 571–582.
Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1133-1153.
Astrachan Binz, C. (2014). Branding the family firm: an empirical exploration of the antecedents and consequences of family firm brand promotion. Dissertation. Written, Deutschland: Universität Witten/Herdecke.
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 173–1182.
Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.G., & Lee, J.N. (2005). Behavioural intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29, 87–111.
Chen, C.J., Huang, J.W., & Hsiao, Y.C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness: the role of organizational climate and structure. International Journal of Manpower 31(8), 848-870.
Chirico, F. & Salvato, C. (2008). Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21, 169–181.
Dyer, W.G.(1988). Culture and continuity in family firms. Family Business Review, 1(1), 37–50.
Farver, J. M., Kim, Y. K., & Lee, Y. (1995). Cultural differ¬ences in Korean- and Anglo-American preschoolers' so¬cial interaction and play behaviors. Child Development, 66, 1088-1099.
Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Levels of Analysis, Governance Mechanisms, and Research Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 455-482.
Gamage, H. R. (2004). Understanding the Social Realities of Entrepreneurial Performance in Sri Lanka: An Alternative Paradigm, Published Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Queensland, Australia.
Ghobadi, S. & Mathiassen, L. (2015). Perceived barriers to effective knowledge sharing in agile software teams. Information Systems Journal 26(2), 1–31.
Huber, G. P. (2001). Transfer of Knowledge in Knowledge Management Systems: Unexplored Issues and Suggested Studies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 72-79.
Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D., & Reay, T. (2013). Can nepotism be a source of competitive advantage? A social exchange perspective on types of nepotism. Family Business Review, 26(2), 121-139.
Koys, D.J., & Decotiis, T.A. (1991). Inductive measures of psychological climate. Human Relations, 44, 265-285.
Krogh, G. V., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lopez, S.P., Peon, J.M.M., & Ordas, C.J.V. (2004). Managing knowledge: the link between culture and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 93-104.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123
Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2009). Going beyond technology: Knowledge sharing as a tool for enhancing customer-oriented attitudes. International Journal of Information Management, 29(5), 353-361.
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., García, M., Burriel, R., Bresó, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Towards a four dimensional model of burnout: A multigroup factor-analytic study including depersonalization and cynicism. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 901-913
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M..G., & Macey, W.H. (2011). Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. In APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 373–414.
Wang, S. & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
Yi, J. A. (2009). Measure of knowledge sharing behavior: scale development and validation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7, 65-81.
Zhu, Y. Q.(2016). Solving knowledge sharing disparity: The role of team identification, organizational identification, and in-group bias. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 1174–1183.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
email@example.com, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz