UNDERGRADUATE HEALTHCARE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE TO E-LEARNING AT MEDICAL UNIVERSITY - PLOVDIV
Abstract
E-learning is seen as a possible solution to the problem of modernization of the university education in response to the changing needs of the society. In undergraduate healthcare training, e-learning is implemented predominantly as blended learning in addition to the traditional classroom teaching. A major factor in the success of e-learning are learners’ attitudes, beliefs and concerns. The aim of the present study was to investigate undergraduate healthcare students’ attitude to e-learning at Medical University – Plovdiv. In this case, e-learning is considered to be electronic educational resources organized as an interactive e-learning unit or course, provided through a learning content management system. The survey was carried out in 2016 through a self-reported questionnaire among 270 first year students from ten healthcare specialties. Participants were asked to express a degree of agreement with nine statements on a five point Likert scale. The influence of gender, age, specialty and previous e-learning experience on the opinion of students was investigated. The results showed that students’ attitudes towards e-learning were positive, but learners were not enthusiastic about it. Genders have different views about e-learning implementation – women are more likely to accept it. The experience first year students had did not allow them to judge if e-learning supports better time-management or life-long learning skills. Students agreed that implementation of e-learning depends on the subjects and there are disciplines that can be provided as distant courses within the learning management system.
References
Abdelaziz, M., Kamel, S. S., & Karam, O. (2011, April). Evaluation of E-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6(2), pp. 50-58.
Bloomfield, J. G., & Jones, A. (2013, December). Using e-learning to support clinical skills acquisitions: Exploring the experiences and perceptions of graduate first-year pre-registration nursing students - A mixed method study. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), pp. 1605-1611.
Cazan, A.-M., Cocorada, E., & Maican, C. I. (2016). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards the computer and the internet with Romanian high-school and university students. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55(A), 258-267.
Cheng, B., Wang, M., Morch, A., Chen, N.-S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000-2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56-72.
Fortson, B. L., Scotti, J. R., Chen, Y.-C., Malone, J., & De Ben, K. S. (2007). Internet Use, Abuse, and Dependence Among Students at a Southeastern Regional University. Journal of American College Health, 56(2), 137-146.
Hegarty, B., & Stewart, A. (2007). The Reality of Online Learning in Nursing Programmes - Two Case Studies. Scope (Flexible Learning). Retrieved декември 7, 2014, from CiteSeerX: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.523.2043&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Instructional Design Central. (2012). Retrieved Декември 12, 2014, from Instructional Design Central. Instructional Design Models and Methods.: http://www.instructionaldesigncentral.com/htm/IDC_instructionaldesignmodels.htm
Julie, H., & Fakude, L. (2006, October). Reflections on Nrsing Students' E-Learning Experiences. Journal of Community and Health Sciences, 1(2).
Khan, B. (2005). Managing E-Learning: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Hershey: Idea Grour Inc.
Kirkova, A., Mateva, N., Taneva, D., & Kireva, D. (2014). Enhancing the quality of e-learning through evaluation by the students. Management & Education / Upravlenie i Obrazovanie, Vol. 10 (3), pp. 30-40. Retrieved 22 February, 2017, from Management & Education / Upravlenie i Obrazovanie,: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?sid=5e1154e5-5b14-4d0d-883b-a35dd38daef4%40sessionmgr4010&vid=0&hid=4205&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=100634689&db=asn
Kirkova-Bogdanova, A., Mateva, N., & Taneva, D. (2016). Modernization of university education of health professionals. Knowledge International Journal, 13.1, pp. 85-88. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from Knowledge International Journal: http://www.ikm.mk/IKM-EN/13.1.pdf#page=85
Kirkova-Bogdanova, A., Mateva, N., Marchev, Y., & Amudjian, D. (2015). Students' perception of computer-based testing at Medical College, Medical University Plovdiv. Knowledge International Journal, Vol. 10/1, pp. 149-152. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from Knowledge International Journal, Vol. 10/1: http://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/15545/7/Repozitorium%2010%201.pdf
Kirkova-Bogdanova, A., Tsokova, Y., Taneva, D., Katsarska, R., & Marchev, Y. (2016). Computer and internet access and usage by healthcare students at Medical University Plovdiv. Knowledge International Jouirnal, 12.1, pp. 256-261. Retrieved February 23, 2017, from Knowledge International Journal: http://www.ikm.mk/IKM-EN/12.1.pdf#page=256
Lahti, M., Hätönen, H., & Välimäki, M. (2014, January). Impact of e-learning on nurses' and student nurses knowledge, skills and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(1), pp. 136-149.
McCord, L., & McCord, W. (2010). Online learning: Getting comfortable in the cyber class. Teaching and Learning in Nursing(5).
Moule, P., Ward, R., & Lockyer, L. (2010). Nursing and healthcare student's experiences and use of e-learning in higher education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(12), pp. 2785-2795.
Moule, P., Ward, R., & Lockyer, L. (2011, January). Issues with e-learning in nursing and health education in the UK: Are new technologies being enbraced in the teaching and learning environments. Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(1), pp. 77-90.
Pollard, E., & Hillage, J. (2001). Exploring e Learning. Report 376., Institute of Employment Studies, London.
Rigby, L., Wilson, I., Baker, J., Walton, T., Price, O., Dunne, K., & Keeley, P. (2012, April). The development and evaluation of a 'blended" enquiry based learning model for mental health nursing students: "making your experience count" (Abstract). Nurse Education Today, 32(3), pp. 303-308.
Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006, March). The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education. Academic Medicine, vol. 81, no.3. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from Academic Medicine: http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN93464.pdf
Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an Inclusive Definition of E-Learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2). Retrieved July 10, 2014, from The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1161/2146
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended learning: a review of UK literature and practice. UK: The Higher Education Academy.
Stoyanova, R., & Kilova, K. (2016). Attitudes of students from "Nurse" specialty to introducing e-learning at Medical University of Plovdiv - economic aspect. Knowledge International Journal, vol.13.2. Retrieved from Knowledge International Journal: http://www.ikm.mk/IKM-EN/13.2.pdf#page=269
WHO. (2015). Elearning for undergraduate health professional education. (N. Al-Shorbaji, R. Atun, J. Car, A. Majeed, & E. Wheeler, Eds.) London: Imperial College.
Williams, B., Boyle, M., Molloy, A., Brightwell, R., Munro, G., Service, M., & Brown, T. (2011, July). Undergraduate paramedic students' attitudes to e-learning: findings from five university programs. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), pp. 89-100.
Copyright information
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
info@iseic.cz, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz
