• Constantin Petrovici Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, The “Alexandru Ioan Cuza“ University of Iasi, Romania
  • Tudor Stanciu The “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Romania
Keywords: Neuro linguistic programming, visual dominance, listening dominance, kinesthetic dominance


This article analyses the different modalities of applying the theory of learning styles in the teaching-learning-assessment process.

On the assumption that the mode of receiving information influences how we learn, the researchers Richard Bandler and John Grinder created the Neuro linguistic programming theory. Learning that considers the neuro-linguistic paradigm is an inclusive learning type, which harmonizes the individual needs of the learner with concrete ways to meet those needs. This type of differentiated training represents a tool which allows teachers to achieve the best possible correspondence between their teaching strategies and individual learning styles.

To support our arguments, we created an example of teaching activities using the Neuro linguistic paradigm in mathematics lessons. This example illustrates how each student can be directed in the process of solving tasks useful in the issue demonstration, tasks which are appropriate to his learning style.


Bandler, R.; Grinder, J. (1976), The Structure of Magic II, Science and behavior Books Inc. pp. 6–9.

Bandura, A., (1986), Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Bateson, G., (2000 reprint. First published 1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Chomsky, N., (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Transformational grammar, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Dunn, R, Dunn, K (1978), Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company.

von Glasersfeld, E., (1996), Footnotes to “The many faces to constructivism”, Educational Researcher, 23(6), 19.

Havârneanu, G., (2009), Aplicaţiile metodei P.A.P.S.A. în predarea matematicii, în Kreatikon, Editura „Pim”, Iasi.

James, W., (1950), The Principles of Psychology, 2 Vols., New York: Dover.

Korzybski, A., (1933), Science and Sanity, Lakeville, Conn.:International Non Aristotelian Libray and Publishing Company.

Kurt Karsten Andersen, (2008), Educația Adulților, Suport de curs/ manual ADEC, Editor: Tudor Stanciu, Traducere: Mihaela Lupu, Iași.

Miller, G. A.; Galanter, E.; and Pribram, K. H, (1960), Plans and Structure of Behavior, New York: Henry Holt and Co.

Radu, T. I., (1978), Învăţământul diferenţiat – concepţii şi strategii, E.D.P., Bucureşti.

Sprenger, M., (2003), Differentiation through learning styles and memory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Stanciu, T., Nițuca, C., (2006), Didactics of Technical Subjects, Tehnopress, Chisinau.

Stanciu, T., Petrovici, C (2013)., Programarea neurolingvistica si instruirea diferentiata, retrived from .