New Evidence For The Environmental Kuznets Curve For Sulphur Dioxide Emissions: A Case Study Of The Czech Republic

Katarína Hercegová, Wadim Strielkowski


In this paper we test the model explaining the inter-dependence between the pollutants and the economic development in the Czech Republic. We calculate the relationship known as the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) by estimating the relationship between the environmental pollution expressed by CO2 and SO2 emissions per capita and the GDP per capita for the Czech Republic for the period from 1990 to 2009. Our findings reveal that the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for the Czech Republic holds in the case of estimating the inter-dependence between GDP per capita and sulphur dioxide.


Environmental Kuznets Curve, Environmental Economics, Co2, So2 Emissions, Economic Development, Czech Republic

Full Text:



• Arrow et al. (1995): Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment, in: Science 268, pp.520-521.

• Beckerman, W. (1992): Economic growth and the environment. Whose growth? Whose environment? In: World Development, 20, pp.481-496.

• Bimonte, S. (2002): Information access, income distribution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, in: Ecological Economics 41/2002, pp. 145-156.

• Czech Statistical Office (2011). Statistics retrieved from:

• Dasgupta, P. (1996): The economics of the environment. The development economics research programme (73), London School of Economics, pp.

• Dasgupta, S. et al., (2002): Confronting the Environmental Kuznets curve, in: Journal of Economic perspectives, Volume 16, Number 1/Winter 2002, pp. 147-168.

• Grossman, G., Krueger, A. (1993): Environmental Impacts of the North American Free Trade Government, in: Garber, P., (ed.): The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, Cambridge, pp. 13-56.

• Grossman, G., Krueger, A. (1995): Economic growth and the environment, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, pp. 353-378.

• Kuznets, S. (1955): Economic growth and income inequality, in: American Economic Review 45, pp. 1-28.

• Maddala, G.S. (2001): Introduction to econometrics, Third edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

• Panayotou, T. (1993): Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development, Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva.

• Panayotou, T. (1993): Green Markets: The Economics of Sustainable Development, Institute for Contemporary Studies Press., pp.

• Perman, R., Stern, D.I. (2003): Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist, in: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 47, pp.

• Perrings, C. (1995): Sustainable livelihoods and environmentally sound technology: theoretical and conceptual approaches, in: Ahmed, I., Doeleman, J.A. (Eds.): Beyond Rio. The Environment Crisis and Sustainable Livelihoods in the Third World, MacMillan Press Ltd.

• Stern, D.I. (1997): Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: a neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics, in: Ecological Economics 22, pp. 197-215.

• Stern, D.I. (1998): Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve?, in: Environment and Development Economics. 3:2, pp.175-198.

• Stern, D.I. (2003): The Environmental Kuznets Curve, International Society for Ecological Economics, pp. 325-347

• Stern, D.I. et al., (1998): Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?, Working papers in Ecological Economics, 9804, Australian National University, Canberra.

• World Bank (2011): World Development Indicators & Global Development Finance. Available at:

• World Commission on Environment and Development (1987): Our Common future, Oxford University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Online ISSN 1804-9710

(c) 2018 CBU, o.p.s.