ICT AS A SOURCE OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE INFORMATION AGE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM ICT LEADING COUNTRIES

  • Farzaneh Khalili University of Malaya, Islamic Azad University of Abhar
  • Kee-Cheok Cheong University of Malaya
  • Wee-Yeap Lau University of Malaya
Keywords: First difference GMM, EU countries, TFP, ICT, Panel data

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to undertake a panel data investigation of long-run and short run Granger causality between total factor productivity, ICT contribution and real GDP for panel of six countries. We use a Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) to test causality and find out that there are unidirectional Granger causality running from ICT contribution to TFP and economic growth in the long-run where ICT contribution did not have a robust short-run causality relationship with economic growth. The negative and statistically significant coefficient of ICT confirms the slow acceleration of TFP among the EU countries. Finally, the long-run relationship between growth and ICT contribution in the 2000s is higher, more significant and robust than in the 1990s. These results point to several important policy implications such as prevailing arguments in favour of technological capacity-enabled growth has not taken into account short-term costs that may include reduced economic growth as shown by our results for the 1990-2000 periods.

References

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1997). Endogenous growth theory: MIT press.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.

Arvanitis , S., & N. Loukis, E. (2009). Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labour productivity: A comparative study based on firm-level data for Greece and Switzerland. Information Economics and Policy, 19(21 (2009)).

Blackburne, E. F., & Frank, M. W. (2009). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stata Journal, 7(2), 197-208.

Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data: Humboldt University of Berlin.

Broersma, L., & Van Ark, B. (2007). ICT, Business Services and Labour Productivity Growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(6), 433-449. doi: 10.1080/10438590600914429

Cronin, F. J., Colleran, E. K., Herbert, P. L., & Lewitzky, S. (1993). Telecommunications and growth: The contribution of telecommunications infrastructure investment to aggregate and sectoral productivity. Telecommunications Policy, 17(9), 677-690.

Cronin, F. J., Parker, E. B., Colleran, E. K., & Gold, M. A. (1991). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic growth: An analysis of causality. Telecommunications Policy, 15(6), 529-535.

Dahl, C., Kongsted, H., & Sørensen, A. (2011). ICT and productivity growth in the 1990s: panel data evidence on Europe. Empirical Economics, 40(1), 141-164. doi: 10.1007/s00181-010-0421-4

Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (2003). Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1-28.

Engelbrecht, H.-J. r., & Xayavong, V. (2006). ICT intensity and New Zealand's productivity malaise: Is the glass half empty or half full? Information Economics and Policy (18 (2006)), 24–42.

Engelbrecht, H. J., & Xayavong, V. (2007). The Elusive Contribution of ICT to Productivity Growth in New Zealand:Evidence From an Extended Industry Level Growth Accounting Model. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(4), 255-275. doi: 10.1080/10438590600692918

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.

Esteban-Pretel, J., Nakajima, R., & Tanaka, R. (2010). TFP growth slowdown and the Japanese labor market in the 1990s. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 24(1), 50-68. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2009.11.002

González-Sánchez, V. M. (2012). ‘Information and communication technologies’ and entrepreneurial activity: drivers of economic growth in Europe. The Service Industries Journal, 1-11. doi: 10.1080/02642069.2013.740466

Gust , C., & Marquez, J. (2004). International comparisons of productivity growth: the role of information technology and regulatory practices. Labour Economics(11).

Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161.

Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2012). Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(3), 300-328. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2012.708134

Hardy, A. P. (1980). The role of the telephone in economic development. Telecommunications Policy, 4(4), 278-286.

Hwan-Joo, S., Young, S. L., & Jeong, H. O. (2009). Does ICT investment widen the growth gap? Telecommunications Policy (33(2009)), 10.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.

Jalava, J. (2003). The new economy in Finland: Production and use of ICT. [Article]. Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift, 56(1), 17-+.

Kao, C., Chiang, M. H., & Chen, B. (1999). International R&D spillovers: an application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 691-709.

Khalili, F., Cheong, K. C., & Lau, W. Y. (2012). Multivariate Granger Causality between Contribution of Information Communication Technology, Total Factor Productivity and Aggregate Output Growth in Sweden. Paper presented at the National Research & Innovation Conference for Graduate Students in Social Sciences 2012 Malaysia,Melaka.

Kretschmer, T. (2012). Information and Communication Technologies and Productivity Growth: A Survey of the Literature: OECD Publishing.

Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & James Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.

Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 631-652.

Madden, G., & Savage, S. J. (1998). CEE telecommunications investment and economic growth. Information Economics and Policy, 10(2), 173-195.

Madden, G., & Savage, S. J. (2000). R&D spillovers, information technology and telecommunications, and productivity in ASIA and the OECD. Information Economics and Policy, 12(4), 367-392.

Maliranta, M., Rouvinen, P., & Airaksinen, A. (2008). IT outsourcing in Finnish business. Available at SSRN 1141750.

Martínez, D., Rodríguez, J., & Torres, J. (2010). ICT-specific technological change and productivity growth in the US: 1980–2004. Information Economics and Policy (22 (2010) ), 121–129.

Mileva, E. (2007). Using Arellano – Bond Dynamic Panel GMM Estimators in Stata,Tutorial with Examples using Stata 9.0,(xtabond and xtabond2). Economics Department,Fordham University.

O'Mahony, M., & Vecchi, M. (2005). Quantifying the impact of ICT capital on output growth: a heterogeneous dynamic panel approach. Economica, 72(288), 615-633.

Papaioannou, S. K., & Dimelis, S. P. (2007). Information Technology as a Factor of Economic Development: Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(3), 179-194. doi: 10.1080/10438590600661889

Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 597-625.

Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 621-634.

Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 79-113.

Pilat, D. (2004). The ICT productivity paradox: insights from micro data. OECD Economic Studies. OECD Economic Studies No. 38, 2004/1, 29.

Röller, L. H., & Waverman, L. (2001). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 909-923.

Roodman, D. (2008). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata.

Shepard, S. B. (1997). The new economy: what it really means. Business week, 17, 48-50.

Sichel, D., & Oliner, S. (2002). Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going? Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System FEDS, 29.

Solow, R. M. (1987). We’d better watch out, New York Times Book Review,12 July,p36.

Stiroh, K. J. (2002). Are ICT spillovers deriving the new economy? Review of Income and Wealth, 20(series 48), 20.

Vu, K. M. (2011). ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996-2005 period. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 357-372. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.02.008

Yousefi, A. (2011). The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: evidence from developed and developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(6), 581-596. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2010.544470

Published
2014-12-18
Section
Articles