DOES PRODUCTIVITY MATTER IN THE ADOPTION OF HYBRID RICE? A COMPARATIVE STUDY

  • Rashed Saeed Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad
  • Arshed Bashir Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad
  • Muhammad Qasim Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad
  • Irfan Mehmood Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad
  • Khuda Bakhsh Environmental & Resource Economics, Agriculture University, Faisalabad
Keywords: Productivity, Profitability, Adoption, Rice, Basmati, Hybrid

Abstract

The present study was designed to analyze comparative economics of hybrid rice and basmati in the core rice growing area of Punjab. Cross-data was collected through well-structured questionnaires from 80 farmers during May and June 2011.Study results reveal that higher yield and less time required for maturity in production were the main reasons for planting of hybrid rice. Hybrid rice occupied 3.6 acres whereas area under basmati was 5.9 acres of the total farm area. Farmers obtained above 60 percent increase in yield of hybrid rice. Results show that cost of production of basmati rice was estimated as Rs.37364 per acre and total revenue was Rs.44768 per acre. The benefit cost ratio of basmati rice was 1.20 and that of hybrid rice was 1.80, implying that hybrid rice has brought comparatively more economic benefits to the farmers as compared to basmati in the study area. Shortage of buyers, much costly poor quality hybrid seed, late payment and higher transportation costs are among major constraints in rice production and marketing.

References

Bordey, F.H., J.M. Cabling, C.B. Casiwan, R.G. Manalili, A.B. Mataia and G.O. Redondo. (2004). Socioeconomic Evaluation of Hybrid Rice Production in the Philippines. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia.

Casiwan, C. B., A. Janaiah, S.R. Francisco, M. Hossain, J. Narciso, C. Ellaine and F.C. Hidalgo. (2003). Hybrid Rice Cultivation in the Philippines: Early Farm-Level Experiences. Economic and Political Weekly, 38: 2502-2508.

Chengappa, P.G., A. Janaiah, and M.V.S. Gowda (2013). Profitability of Hybrid Rice Cultivation: Evidence from Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly, 2531-2534.

Duvick, D.N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding People and Protecting Natural Resources. In: Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Government of Pakistan (1998). Census Report, Population Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

Janaiah, A., and Xie. F.(2010). Hybrid Rice Adoption in India: Farm Level Impacts and Challenges. IRRI Technical Bulletin No.14. Los Banos (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute. 20 p.

Lin, J.Y. (1990). Education and Innovation Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Hybrid Rice in China. Working Paper # 603, Department of Economics, University of California, Los Angeles.

Rice Exporters Association of Pakistan. 2012. News correspondent from Lahore published statement of REAP in International the News regarding cultivation/yield of hybrid and basmati rice on Wednesday, December 19, 2012.

Sheikh, A.D., M.A. Mahmood. and A. Bashir (2003). Socio-Economic Research Studies, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, 2002-03.

Virmani, S.S., C.X. Mao, R.S. Toledo, M. Hossain and A. Janaiah. (2002). Hybrid Rice Seed Production Technology and its Impacts on Seed Industries & Rural Employment Opportunities in Asia, paper published in Food & Fertilizer Technology Centre, 5.F14 Wenchow St., Taipei 10616 Taiwan.

Vien, T.D. and N.T.D. Nga (2007). Economic Impact of Hybrid Rice in Vietnam: An Initial Assessment, Hanoi University of Agriculture, Vietnam.

Ward, P.S. and V. Pede (2013). Spatial Patterns of Technology Diffusion: The Case of Hybrid Rice in Bangladesh. Paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.

Published
2013-12-15
Section
Articles