THE HIERARCHY AND TYPOLOGY OF FAMILY SOCIAL SUPPORT NETWORKS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL SERVICES

Ivana Loučková, Alice Gojová

Abstract


This article examines the importance of family social support networks and their implications for social services. Social support networks are a significant factor in effective assistance to families. This research uses an integrated strategy and factor analysis to identify stakeholders of social support services and the extent in which these services are considered important by families in terms of solving their problems. Our findings show that assistance to families is expected in three levels. The first involves direct interpersonal relationships (between family members and friends) and when this level fails, the network of professionals and experts is the next provider. An effective network of support services to families "stands and falls" with active family relationships. Where family relationships are absent or dysfunctional, they are compensated by second and third levels of this support. In a developed network of support services, social workers should have tools available to support all three levels. In view of these findings, a trend emphasizing approaches in favor of families solving their own problems rather than professional dominance of such is worth investigating.


Keywords


social networks, family, social services

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beck, U. (2007). Vynalézání politiky. K teorii reflexivní modernizace. [Inventing policy. The theory of reflexive modernization.] Praha: SLON

Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2004). Families in a Runaway World. Scott, J., Treas, J., Richard, M. The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Burford, G., & Hudson, J. (2000). Family Group Conferencing. New Directions in Community-Centered Child and Family Practise. New Jersey: Transaction publishers.

Clarijs, R., & Malmberg, T. (2012). The Quiet Revolution, Aggrandising People Power by Family Group Conferences. Amsterdam: SWP Publishes.

Collins, S., Jordan, C., & Coleman, H. (2007). An Introduction to Family Social Work. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.

Frost, N., Abram, F., & Burgess, H. (2014). Family group conferences: evidence, outcomes and future research. Child & Family Social Work, 19 (4), 501-507.

Hardcastle, D. A., Powers, P. R., & Wenocur, S. (2004). Community Practice. Theories and Skills for Social Workers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Keller, J. (2012). Nová sociální rizika a proč se jim nevyhneme. [New social risks and why not avoid them.] Praha: SLON.

Loučková, I. (2010). Integrovaný přístup v sociálně vědním výzkumu. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství [An integrated approach to social science research. Prague : Sociological publishing] SLON.

McKeown, K. (2000). A Guide to what works in family support services for vulnerable families. Dublin. (3.1.2016) Retrieved from: http://www.dcya.gov.ie/documents/publications/A_Guide_to_what_Works_in_Family_Support_Serviecs_for_Vunerable_Families.pdf

Rowe, W., & Rapp-Paglicci, L. A. (eds.) (2008). Comprehensive Handbook of Social Work and Social Welfare. New Yersay: Wiley.

Sirovátka, T., & Winkler, J. (2010). Význam „nových sociálních rizik“ v současné společenské vědě. In: Sociální studia. Brno: Fakulta sociálních studií Masarykovy university [Meaning " new social risks " in contemporary social science . In Social Studies . Brno: Faculty of Social Studies], 2010, 1, 7-21.

Sociotrendy (2015). Model minimálního rámce sítě služeb na úrovni obcí s rozšířenou působností. [Model minimum framework network services at the level of municipalities with extended powers.] Praha: MPSV.

Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004). New Risks, New Welfare. The Transformation of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v4.772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2016 Central Bohemia University