BUSINESS CAPABILITIES AND HR KNOWLEDGE’ AS THE CRITICAL FACTOR OF DUE DILIGENCE IN PRE-ACQUISITION PHASE
Abstract
Previous theoretical research has argued that due diligence in the pre-acquisition phase is traditionally oriented towards legal and financial matters. However, in the innovation-driven market environment, where firms need to maintain competitive strength, business skills and knowledge play important roles. Despite this difference, the due diligence research continues in traditional areas, e.g., financial history, legal and commercial liabilities, and tax issues. Hence, the problem may arise in acquirers overpaying or mistakenly rejecting a target firm. There is a need for assessing ‘Business Capabilities and Human Resources Knowledge’ for due diligence in the pre-acquisition phase. Based on a fundamental review of critical factors in mergers and acquisitions, this study seeks to examine the inclusion of this factor in due diligence during pre-acquisition. The research method includes a cross-sectional survey among firms with cross-border acquisition experience. The results of the empirical research provide reasonable support towards the organizational learning theory, suggesting that the more the acquirer learns about the critical factor, “Business Capabilities and Human Resources Knowledge”, the better the acquisition success. These results highlight the importance of expanding the traditional due diligence view by including this critical factor as the integral part of the pre-acquisition investigation.References
Adolph, G., Gillies, S., & Krings, J., (2006). Strategic Due Diligence: A Foundation for M&A Success. Strategy + Business - enews, pp.1–8.
Angwin, D., (2001). Mergers and Acquisitions across European Borders: Preacquisition Due Diligence and the Use of Professional Advisers. Journal of World Business, 36(1), pp.32–57.
Appelbaum, S. H., Roberts, J. & Shapiro, B. T., (2009). Cultural Strategies in M & As: Investigating Ten Case Studies. Journal of Executive Education, 8(1), pp.33–58.
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2003). Multivariate Analysemethoden 10th ed., Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Barkema, H. G. & Schijven, M. (2008). The pre-acquisition evaluation of target firms and cross border acquisition performance. Journal of Management, 34(3), pp.594–634.
Brauer, M. (2006). What Have We Acquired and What Should We Acquire in Divestiture Research? A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 32(6), pp.751–785.
Collins, J. D., Holcomb T., Certo, T., Hitt, M. A., & Lester, R. H. (2009). Learning by Doing: Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 62 (12), pp. 1329-1334.
Cullinan, G., & Holland, T., (2002). Strategic Due Diligence. In Due Diligence for Global Deal Making. 2002, Rosenbloom, A., Bloomberg Press Princeton, pp. 13–50.
Crown, W. H. (1998). Statistical Methods for Social and Behavioral Sciences - Multiple Regression and Limited-Dependent-Variable Models 1st ed., Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Edition.
Firstbrook, B. C., (2008). Cross-border M & A Handle with care. Accenture Outlook 2008, (3), p. 10. London.
Gomes, E., Angwin, D. N., Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y., (2013). Critical Success Factors through the Mergers and Acquisitions Process: Revealing Pre- and Post-M & A Connections for Improved Performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(1), pp.13–35.
Harding, D., & Rouse, T. (2007). Human Due Diligence. Harvard business review, 85(4), pp.124–131.
Hitt, M. A., King, D., Krishnan, H., Makri, M., & Schijven, M. (2009). Mergers and acquisitions: Overcoming pitfalls, building synergy, and creating value. Business Horizons, 52(6), pp.523–529.
Hopkins, H. D. (1999). Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions: Global and Regional Perspectives. Journal of International Management, 5(3), pp.207–239.
King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), pp.187–200.
Kissin, W. D., & Herrera, J. (1990). International Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Business Strategy, 11(July/August), pp.51–54.
Knecht, F., & Calenbuhr, V. (2007). Using capital transaction due diligence to demonstrate CSR assessment in practice. Corporate Governance, 7(4), pp.423–433.
Krug, J. A. (2009). Brain drain: why top management bolts after M&As. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(6), pp.4–14.
Laabs, J., Schiereck, D., Babl, C. (2011). How a Good Bidder Becomes a Good Target: The Case of Continental AG Acquiring Siemens VDO. International Review of Economics & Management Engineering, 1(1), pp.7–21.
Laabs, J. P., Schiereck, D. (2008). The long-term success of M&A in the automotive supply industry: determinants of capital market performance. Journal of Economics and Finance, 34(1), pp.61–88.
Lemieux, O. P., Banks, J. C. (2007). High tech M&A – strategic valuation. Management Decision, 45(9), pp.1412–1425.
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), pp.542–555.
Malhotra, S., Zhu, P. (2013.) Paying for cross-border acquisitions: The impact of prior acquirers ’ decisions. Journal of World Business, 48(2), pp.271–281.
Makri, M., Hitt, M., Lane, P. (2010). Complementary Technologies, Knowledge Relatedness and Innovation in High Technology Mergers and Acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (6), pp. 602-628.
Marks, M., Mirvis, P. H. (2001). Making Mergers and Acquisitions Work: Strategic and Psychological Preparation. Academy of Management, 15(2), pp.80–92.
Mukherji, A., Mukherjia, J., Dibrell, C., Francisco, J. D. (2013). Overbidding in cross-border acquisitions: Misperceptions in assessing and valuing knowledge. Journal of World Business, 48(1), pp.39–46.
Perry, J. S. & Herd, T. J. (2004). Mergers and Acquisitions: Reducing M&A risk through improved due diligence. Strategy & Leadership, 32(2), pp.12–19.
Phene, A., Tallman, S., Almeida, P. (2010). When Do Acquisitions Facilitate Technological Exploration and Exploitation? Journal of Management, 38(3), pp.753–783.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879–903.
Porrini, P. (2004). Can a Previous Alliance Between an Acquirer and a Target Affect Acquisition Performance? Journal of Management, 30(4), pp.545–562.
Price, M., Harvey, M., Lusch, R. F. (1998). Beyond traditional due diligence for mergers an acquisitions in the 21st century. Review of Business, 19(3), pp.17–22.
Reuer, J. J. (2005). Avoiding Lemons in M & A Deals. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), pp.14–17.
Schoenberg, R. (2004). Dimensions of Management Style Compatibility and Cross-Border Acquisition Outcome. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 3(04), pp.149–175.
Schuler, R. & Jackson, S. (2001). HR Issues and Activities in Mergers and Acquisitions. European Management Journal, 19(3), pp.239–253.
Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), pp.307–353.
Tewes, C. (2001). M&A Privatisations in Poland - Key Success Factors of Cross-border Acquisitions into the Polish Market. Dissertation. p. 235.
Very, P., Schweiger, D. M. (2001). The Acquisition Process as a Learning Process: Evidence from a Study of Critical Problems and Solutions In Domestic and Cross-Border. Journal of World Business, 36(1), pp.11–31.
Schoenberg, R. (2004). Dimensions of Management Style Compatibility and Cross-Border Acquisition Outcome. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 3(04), pp.149–175.
Schuler, R. & Jackson, S. (2001). HR Issues and Activities in Mergers and Acquisitions. European Management Journal, 19(3), pp.239–253.
Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), pp.307–353.
Tewes, C. (2001). M&A Privatisations in Poland - Key Success Factors of Cross-border Acquisitions into the Polish Market. Dissertation. p. 235.
Very, P., Schweiger, D. M. (2001). The Acquisition Process as a Learning Process: Evidence from a Study of Critical Problems and Solutions In Domestic and Cross-Border. Journal of World Business, 36(1), pp.11–31.
Copyright information
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 - CC BY 3.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
info@iseic.cz, www.iseic.cz, ojs.journals.cz