Menbere Workie, Edita Hekelová


This paper critically discusses whether, and to what extent, the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) compiled by the World Economic Forum is informative, given the cross-positive effect across indicators that involve ranking of countries. The results suggest positive cross-effects between sub-indices for a group of economies in the European Union (EU) and other certain advanced economies. Economies with an advanced level of higher education and training, and a superior level of innovation, tend to experience a higher level of ranking in the global competitiveness index compared to countries with lower levels of education and innovation. The results of this study for a group of 28 EU member states during 2007-2015 reveal a heterogonous position of the EU member states despite their obvious achievement of converging income-per-capita in the same period. However, the results also indicate potential methodological inconsistencies in terms of the ranking of countries, relating to a common problem in economics, known as endogeneity or reverse causality, and based on variables that, statistically, appeared significantly correlated to each other.


competitiveness, endogeneity, Global Competitiveness Index

Full Text:



Barro, J. (2003). Determinants of Economic growth in a Panel of Economies. Annals of Economics and Finance, 4, 231–274.

Blanke, J., Paua, F., and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2009). ‘The Growth Competitiveness Index: Analyzing Key Underpinnings of Sustained Economic Growth’, in The Global Competitiveness Report: 2004–05, M. Porter et al., (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frenkel, M., Koske, I., and Swonke, C. (2003). How Competitive are Europe’s Economies? Findings of the Global Competitiveness Report 2002-2003, Inter economics, January/February, 31-37.

Investment Frontier (2014). Three Ways to Use The 2014 Global Competitiveness Report. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from

Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession, Foreign Affairs, 73 (2) (28-44).

Lall, S. (2001). Competitive Indices and Developing Countries, An Economic Evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report, World Development, Vol. 29, No. 9 (1501-1525).

Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (3-42).

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. N. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, May. (407-437).

MacArthur, W.J and Sachs, J. (2002). The Growth Competitiveness Index: Measuring Technological Advancement and the Stages of Development. Retrieved

Nelson, R. R., and Phelps, E. (1966). Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth, The American Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 1/2. (69-75).

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (71-102).

Sala-i-Martin, X., J. Blanke, M. Drzeniek Hanouz, T. Geiger, I. Mia, and F. Paua. (2008). The Global Competitiveness Index: Prioritizing the Economic Policy Agenda. In Schwab, K. (2008) Retrieved from

Schuller, B. J, and Lidbom, M. (2009). Competitiveness of Nations in the Global Economy: Is Europe Internationally Copetitive? Economics and Management, 14 (934-939).

Schwab, K. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Index 2009–2010. World Economic Forum. Retrieved

Workie Tiruneh, M., and Griffin, D. (2015). Can We Be Competitive without Being Educated? Empirical Findings from European Data. Proceedings from the Annual Conference „Management Challenges in the 21st Century: HR Trends and Challenges: How to Succeed in Turbulent Times.

Schwab, K. (2012). World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report (2012-2013). Retrieved

Schwab, K. (2015). World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report (2014-2015) Retrieved

World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness database (2015-2016). Retrieved



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2016 Central Bohemia University