Saniye Karaman Öztaş, Cahide Aydin İpekçi


Structural systems, which play an important role in today’s architectural education, have become an issue that is analyzed by mega structures using different disciplines in the process from the design stage to the construction stage. While design and structural system studies are performed together in practice, architecture students usually have difficulty in reflecting their learning from the structural system course into their design studio in architectural education. In this study, information about education method for "Structural System and Technologies I" course, carried out in the fourth semester (second class) in Department of Architecture in Gebze Technical University, was primarily given. Unlike previous teaching methods in this course scope, a structural system modeling to solve the given design problem was requested from the students during spring semester 2015. It was aimed to provide the students with an understanding of general design principles involving structural elements and learning about the necessity in which the structural system should be considered in conjunction with the architectural design, concluding with a two-week assignment. A survey was conducted among 55 architecture students in order to evaluate the outcomes of the assignment. According to the survey results, 61% of the students stated that function, form, and structural system affect on another. 20% of them stated that function, form, and structural system, respectively, have an order of importance in the design process. 9% of them stated that structural system determine form and function. 6 % of them stated that form, function, and structural system, respectively, have an order of importance in the design process. Finally, 4 % of them stated that their relations change depending on the condition. Innovative teaching method in this study is found to be successful because the students have experienced the importance of materials in structural system and learned how to integrate structural system course to architectural design studio. It is intended that this study will benefit architecture students and educators.


Education, architecture, innovation, structural system

Full Text:



Aziz, A. A., Fahmi, M. M., & Bane, L. T. (2010). Integration of Structural Knowledge in Design Studio Project: Assessment Study of Curriculum in Architecture Course in University Of Malaya. Retrieved from

Erpi F. (1995, July). How is an architectural education, Mimarlık, 264(32), 17-18.

Hyett, P. (2000). Architecture Students must be properly equipped to practice. The Architectural Journal, 212.

İncedayı, D. (2010). Thoughts on Architectural Education from ACE and the EAAE Joint Meeting, Mimarist, 38(10), 93-102.

İpekçi, C. A., & Coşgun, N. (2011). Importance of Structural System Courses in Architectural Education. Structural Systems Symposium in Architecture. Proceedings book, 29-33. İstanbul.

Salvadori, H. (1975). Structure in Architecture. The Building of Building. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Thornberg, J. M. (2005). Architectural Design Education in Europe: Mind, Land and Society in a Global World. Ideas and Reflections on Architectural and Urban Design Education: EAAE Transactions on Architectural Education no.28. ed. Constantin Spiridonidis. Thessaloniki, Greece: Art of text S.A.

Vassigh, S. (2005). Structure learning center home. from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2016 Central Bohemia University