PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE NATURAL AND SOCIAL EVOLUTION

Nadezhda Subbotina

Abstract


Investigation of the social evolution process and its differences from the natural evolution requires methodological substantiation. This article proposes a methodological approach based on the Hegelian dialectics.  We distinguish two types of development: development based on external premises and development based on own foundation (self-development). The dialectics of preservation and change shows itself differently among these types.  

Social evolution is a new branch of the global evolution; its motion vector is directed toward big changes and acceleration. At the same time, the speed of natural evolution remains slow.  Emerging “scissors” create tension between the human’s natural and social sides. Natural evolution requires a person to perform the preservation functions, while social evolution requires changing functions.


Keywords


social evolution, dialectics, identity, difference, preservation, changing, development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1998). In I. Eibl-Eibisfeldt & F. Salter (Eds.), The Evolution of Human Ultra-sociality. Ideology, Warfare, and Indoctrinability (pp. 71-95). Berghan Books.

Damste, P. H. (2009). Concentric man: Human systems of communication, adaptation and defence learning to communicate. Retrieved May 5, 2013, from https://sites.google.com/site/concentricman/

Grinin, L. E., Carneiro, R. L., Korotayev, A. V., & Spier, F. (Eds.). (2011). Evolution Cosmic, Biological, and Social. Volgograd: Uchitel Publishing House.

Grinin, L. E., Markov, A. V., & Korotaev, A. V. (2009). Makroevolyutsiya v zhivoy prirode i v obshchestve [Macroevolution in nature and society]. Moscow: Librokom publishing house.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, Vol. 1, translation by Humphrey Palmer, or The Logic of Hegel. In W. Wallace (Trans.), The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, (pp. 52-361). Retrieved April 1, 2013, from http://www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Hegel,G.W.F/Hegel,_G.W.F._-_Encyclopaedia_of_the_Philosophical_Sciences_Part_One.pdf

Panov, A. D. (2008). Yedinstvo sotsial'no-biologicheskoy evolyutsii i predel yeyo uskoreniya [The unity of the socio-biological evolution and the limit of its acceleration]. Historical psychology and sociology history, 2, 25-48.

Perreault, C., Moya, C., & Boyd, R. (2012). A Baysian approach to the evolution of social learning. Evolution & Human Behavior, Proofs. Retrieved December 15, 2013, from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/boyd/Publications

Snooks, B. R. (2010). The Universal Stages of Evolution. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://www.valuescentre.com/

uploads/2010-04-19/The Universal Stages of Evolution Lessons for Leadership Development.pdf

Vinge, V. (1993). The Coming Technological Singularity. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from http://www.accelerating.org/articles/comingtechsingularity.html




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v2.463

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2017 Central Bohemia University