Katya Peeva, Georgi Arabadzhiev, Georgi Yordanov


The student is the main subject in the education process. The goal of the study is to examine the relative weight of the components of learning process in the students’ evaluation assessment for quality of higher medical education. Direct individual inquiry with rank answers for 541 medical students was completed. Logistic regression analysis was done to create predictive models and derive relationships between quality of education factors and its dependents: assessment of quality and students' progress. Tolerance and respectfulness (OR = 13.1), high general culture (OR = 18.4), clearand accessiblecontemporaryteaching (OR = 9.2), engagement of the audience (OR = 3.4), are the teacher characteristics in the model. Application ofnew technologiesinlearning (OR = 4.2),discussion (OR = 5.9), patients observations and live contact (OR = 5.6) are educational methods determine the qualityof education. Accordinginterns quality of education isdetermined mainly by clinical facilities, quality lectures,solving clinical cases, and practical work. 

Full Text:



Aleamoni, L. M. (1984). Student ratings of instruction. In J. Millman (Ed.). Handbook Of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

ASQ, World Quality Month. (2012, November). The cost of poor quality. Retrieved November 9, 2012, from

Davies, M., Hirschberg, J., Lye, L., Johnston, C. & McDonald, I. (2007). Systematic influences on teaching evaluations: the case for caution. Australian Economic Papers, 3, 18-38.

Djankov, E., Feschieva, N. & Peychev, N. (1986). Sotsiologicheski izsledvaniya i upravlenie na uchebno-vuzpitatelniya protses vuv VMI [Sociological research and management of the educational process at VMI]. Paper presented at Second creative meeting-competition "Inventions and, best practices in healthcare region of Varna" held in Varna, Bulgaria.

Donnon, T., Delver, H. & Beran, T. (2010). Student and teaching characteristics related to ratings of instruction in medical sciences graduate programs. Medical Teacher, Vol. 32, No. 4, 327-332. PMid:20353330

Feschieva, N. & Daskalova, S. (1980). Uchebno vŭzpitatelen protses - faktor za profesionalnata adaptatsiya na studentite-meditsi. Rezultati ot edna anketa [Academic educational process - a factor for occupational adaptation of medical students. Results of a survey]. Medical science and education, 5, 3-5.

Goldstein, G. S. & Benassi, V. A. (2006). Students’ and instructors’ beliefs about excellent lecturers and discussion leaders. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 685-707.

Hadziiliev, V. (2009). Analiz na studentskoto mnenie za vŭvezhdaneto na novi formi v obuchenieto po khimiya v Meditsinski fakultet, TU, Stara Zagora [Analysis of the students' opinion on the introduction of new forms of teaching chemistry at the Medical Faculty, Trakia University, Stara Zagora]. Proceedings of Second National Conference with international participation "The quality of higher education in Bulgaria - problems and prospects" held in Rousse, Bulgaria, Vol. 1, p. 191-201.

Ivanov, K., Feschieva, N. & Petkova, L. (1983). Aktivnoto obuchenie – sredstvo za povishavane efektivnostta na uchebniya protses po sotsialna khigiena i organizatsiya na zdraveopazvaneto [Active learning - a tool for increasing the efficiency of learning in social hygiene and health care organization]. Paper presented at Jubilee Session Medical Faculty, Tolbuhin and High Institute of Medicine, Varna, held in Tolbuhin, Bulgaria, October 29, 1983.

Kellaghan, T. & Greaney, V. (2001). Using assessment to improve the quality of education. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning. Retrieved December 11, 2009 from

Kyuchukov, R. (2009). Anketiraneto kato element na sistemite po kachestvo vuv visshite uchilishta [Interview as part of quality systems in higher education]. Paper presented at Second National Conference with international participation "The quality of higher education in Bulgaria - problems and prospects" held in Rousse, Bulgaria.

Marsh, H. W. & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Volume 8. New York, NY: Agathon Press.

Mathematical Association of America. (2009). What is assessment? Retrieved December 11, 2009, from

Parakh, K. (2007). Assessment in Medical Education. N Engl J Med, 356, 2108-2110,

Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387-415.

Richardson, J. T. E., Slater, J. B. et al. (2007).The National Student Survey: Development, findings and implications. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-580.

Savage, C. S., Uhre, K., Kova, V., Wennekes & Jensen-Dahm, C. (July 6-10, 2005). Quality assurance in medical schools. Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2016 Central Bohemia University